Key facts
- Ligonier Ministries, a Florida-based Christian organization founded by theologian R.C. Sproul, launched the Grow app to help users deepen their faith through biblical and theological content.
- Ligonier Ministries President Chris Larson framed the Grow AI as an example of ‘ethical AI,’ emphasizing guardrails to prevent harm while avoiding personification of the assistant.
- The Milwaukee Independent calls for transparency laws, ethical oversight, and public education to prevent ‘Christian AI’ from automating moral truth, which it warns could undermine both democracy and religious integrity.
- Ligonier wants trusted theological answers and assistant integrity that stays inside its limits.
Ligonier Ministries, a Florida-based Christian organization founded by theologian R.C. Sproul, launched the Grow app to help people study scripture and theology, and its AI assistant routes users who discuss suicide to human counselors or the 988 crisis line, though the group has not disclosed a launch date. The assistant relies solely on the organization’s own collection of tens of thousands of faith-based teaching pieces. President Chris Larson said in an Oct. 30, 2026, Fox News Digital interview that the material covers 50 years of material from a group of more than 800 teachers, and he described the ministry’s purpose as spreading the message of God’s holiness to as many people as possible.
Larson described the assistant as an example of ethical AI, saying it uses guardrails to prevent harm while avoiding personification of the technology. He said the system remains inside a sandbox (a restricted environment with set boundaries) and sends users to a real person when they push its boundaries, a choice Larson called deliberate, and that the assistant does not try to pretend to be a person. The organization wants trusted theological answers and assistant integrity that stays inside its limits. For Ligonier, Christian faith is the absolute truth behind its AI model.
The president said powerful AI companies are not revealing their worldview, and he asked how they determine right from wrong, contrasting Ligonier’s faith-based framework with undisclosed corporate worldviews. Larson said developers should police themselves with guardrails to figure out right from wrong, pointing to Christian faith as the ethical basis. He said the assistant is not meant to replace a pastor, a church elder, or a parent.
Ligonier’s AI design was shaped by examples where AI chatbots such as ChatGPT supposedly played a role in user suicides through harmful suggestions or by endorsing self-destructive plans, Larson said, citing relatives of suicide victims who say the chatbots were at least partly to blame for deaths over the past several years. Teenager Adam Raine died by suicide last year, his parents’ lawsuit says, following months of conversations about suicidal thoughts on ChatGPT. OpenAI rejects the lawsuit’s description and states that ChatGPT pointed Adam Raine toward crisis resources on multiple occasions.
When a user brings up suicide, the assistant sends them to the suicide hotline or other real-world help, Larson said. People can contact the crisis line at 988 or 1-800-273-TALK (8255). Ligonier stresses that the app steers vulnerable users toward human help, though it has not disclosed how many people use the platform. That sandbox method differs from most large language models, which do not have similar safeguards.

The Milwaukee Independent, in a June 7, 2026, article, warned that Christian AI projects like Gloo risk weaving evangelical ideas into digital systems and turning faith into a matter of engagement metrics and surveillance. Gloo, led by former Intel CEO Patrick Gelsinger, provides churches with data dashboards, automated ministry tools, and AI pastoral assistants, all described as spiritual empowerment. Gelsinger departed Intel’s chief executive role amid shareholder lawsuits and later took the executive chairman position at Gloo. Gloo calls itself digital infrastructure for what it terms the faith ecosystem.
The Milwaukee Independent says Gloo’s tools include software designed to measure private belief as behavior data to exert religious influence. Critics argue these systems could substitute algorithmic results for human moral judgment, especially when based on skewed theological data that takes scripture out of context to predict behavior. According to the article, pastors get dashboards that rate spiritual health based on attendance, donations, and participation, making worship a test of algorithmic loyalty.
The Milwaukee Independent says Gelsinger’s role in Gloo shows a wider pattern of technology executives combining business goals with evangelical beliefs and using AI to promote the kingdom of God as part of a business strategy. Gelsinger has said he wants to “hasten the coming of Christ’s return,” and he works where corporate power, religious power, and political power meet. During the second Trump administration, the article says, wealthy right-wing backers and evangelical financiers have been urged to treat technology as a moral weapon, and members of Congress tied to Trump support funding for faith-based innovation.
The Milwaukee Independent urges transparency laws, ethical supervision, and public education to stop Christian AI from automating moral truth, warning this could damage democracy and religious integrity. “We don’t want it to take the place of a pastor or a local church elder or even a parent,” Larson said. The article says scripture used as training data can be removed from its original setting and made into predictive systems that link morality to obedience, while treating ethical complexity as noise that should be filtered out, and describes Christian AI as offering certainty, which the author calls the enemy of democracy and divinity. The piece also says secular tools based on public information might reflect the moral rankings of religious control if that control spreads through society.

Join the discussion